Just listening to Jerry Agar on Newstalk 1010 over Patrick Brown. The screened callers aren’t exactly informed and are getting their facts messed up with no one to remind them of the basic facts of the case. Someone took issue with Patrick Brown’s accusers being “anonymous” and that Brown as a right to “face his accusers”. They are manipulating the narrative, without bothering with a single fact.
Because Brown knows exactly who his accusers are. Here is a passage of an article I have used before:
So Brown knows who are his accusers. He knows of the incidents in question.
So the narrative that these are faceless women, and poor little boy Brown has no idea who is talking, or what they are talking about is rubbish.
And I am quoting his own words.
Scandal doesn’t just happen when something is illegal. Canada is not exactly some country that cracks down on anything. We have the Gerald Stanley verdict to remind us that it doesn’t always matter if a law is on the books, you don’t always have to answer for your actions.
I don’t care if what Brown did was illegal. When a person in a position of power asks an underling for date, that is a form of bullying. You are not on equal ground. That’s not flattering. I am not on the job to get dates, or be noticed for my looks. I have to earn a living, stupid.
As I have said before, there are other things that Brown is associated with — the nomination process in various ridings — that have bigger ramifications, and show that a clear pattern of strong-arming and bullying. I don’t think the PC Party would have kicked him that fast and disavowed of him that quickly unless they saw an opening to rid themselves of someone of that ilk.
And when you see a glow and a popularity surge from a party who is in turmoil at this very inconvenient juncture right before an election, you know that things must have been horrific during the previous regime.
That tells us everything we need to know about Patrick Brown. He is going after women, while keeping quiet on the other issues surrounding his leadership.
But that doesn’t suit the narrative of the #MeToo critics who are hoping against hope that Brown can dodge this bullet with his blustering tirade. Harvey Weinstein is blustering, too. It doesn’t mean a thing.